Three formats to choose from
Threads gives you three ways to bring long-form writing over. A single post holds up to 500 characters. A thread chains several posts together. And since September 2025, Meta lets you attach up to 10,000 characters of text to a post, which readers can open without leaving the app.
Each fits a different job. Standalone posts are for single claims. A thread is for an argument that needs steps. A text attachment is for when the nuance is the point and splitting it would lose something, for example a full case study or a process with caveats. You can combine them: a short post that states the claim, with the longer reasoning attached.
The example article
Say you run a small SaaS and wrote a 1,600-word post called "Why our onboarding emails stopped working". It opens with two paragraphs of context, describes three experiments, includes a chart of activation rates and ends with a checklist. Like most blog posts, its sharpest sentence is buried in the middle: "Our best-performing email had no product screenshots at all."
The steps below use this article. The numbers in it are invented for the example; with your own article, use your own.
Step by step
Step 1: Mark every sentence that makes a claim someone could disagree with. In the example: "Our best-performing email had no product screenshots at all", "Most onboarding sequences are too long" and "Day-one emails should ask a question, not explain features". Background sentences ("Onboarding matters for SaaS") are not candidates.
Step 2: Mark every specific result. "Activation went from 31% to 38% after we cut the sequence from seven emails to four." One result, stated plainly, is a complete post.
Step 3: Decide what becomes the thread. The three experiments are a natural sequence: hook, one post per experiment, a closing post with the takeaway and a question. That is five posts, not fifteen.
Step 4: Decide what becomes standalone. The screenshot claim and the four-email result each work alone. Rewrite them in first person and drop anything that refers back to the article ("as mentioned above").
Step 5: Decide what goes into an attachment, or nowhere. The checklist and the methodology are too detailed for a feed post but useful to the few who want them. Attach them as text to the final post, or link the article once at the end of the thread.
- Mark arguable claims.
- Mark specific results.
- Group a natural sequence into one thread of three to seven posts.
- Rewrite the strongest single claims as standalone posts.
- Move detail into a text attachment or a single link.
What the output looks like
Standalone post (154 characters): "Our best onboarding email had no product screenshots. Just one question: what are you trying to get done this week? Replies tripled. Screenshots can wait."
Thread opener (109 characters): "We tested three changes to our onboarding emails over two months. One worked, one did nothing, one backfired:"
From one article that is one thread, two or three standalone posts and an attachment, spread over two or three weeks rather than posted in one afternoon. The intro paragraphs, the chart and the SEO subheadings stayed behind, which is normal.
Pro tip
Paste the section you want to split into the Thread Formatter to get a first cut at sentence boundaries, then rewrite the first line of every post so it makes sense on its own.
Common mistakes
Posting the introduction. Blog intros set context for search engines and slow readers; in a feed they read as throat-clearing. Start with the claim.
Pasting without rewriting. Article sentences are built to sit in paragraphs. Read each post aloud; if it sounds like a document, shorten it until it sounds like you talking.
Using everything at once. Ten posts from the same article in one week tell your followers you ran out of ideas. Mix repurposed posts with new ones.
Sources
Platform facts in this guide link to Meta's own documentation, its newsroom or established tech press. Advice without a source is our editorial judgement, not a Meta rule.
Ready to apply this?
Format your blog post into a thread now
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I link back to the original article?+
Once, where it is useful: at the end of a thread or in a follow-up post. Links in Threads posts are clickable. Putting the link in every post makes the series read like an ad.
Can I repurpose old articles?+
Yes, if the content is still correct. Check every number and every product detail before you post it; platform features in particular change often, and an outdated claim is worse than none.
Do newsletters work the same way?+
Yes, and often better, because newsletters are already written in a personal voice. The same five steps apply.